Friday, June 1, 2012
Volume:
28
Issue:
6
Abstract:
Defining terrorism, terrorist acts and terrorists has for decades created serious problems to both international and domestic lawyers and academics.[1] Recently, the United Kingdom Court of Appeal (hereinafter the Court), in its decision in Regina v Mohammed Gul,[2] has contributed to the debate on this controversial issue.
[1] See e.g. Ben Saul, Defining Terrorism in International Law, Oxford University Press 2006.
[2] Regina v Mohammed Gul, Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 22 February 2012, [2012] EWCA Crim 280.