European Human Rights Grand Chamber Overturns Convictions for Use of Hearsay Evidence Where Defendant Had No Ability to Cross Examine Witnesses

IMPORTANT: The full content of this page is available to premium users only.

Sunday, April 1, 2012
Author: 
Bruce Zagaris
Volume: 
28
Issue: 
4
Abstract: 

On December 15, 2011, the European Court of Human Rights held that permitting the admission of a witness statement as evidence where the witness is not available for cross examination and that evidence is the sole or decisive basis for convicting the accused violates the right to a fair trial provided in articles 6 §1 and 6 § 3(d) of the European Convention on Human Rights.[1]



                [1]               Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. United Kingdom, Grand Chamber, European Court of Human Rights (Applications nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06), Jan. 20, 2012 (http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/viewhbkm.a766/05 (20 January 2009).sp?sessionId=85568443).